ClaudeSuperPower

signals-scout-skills-store

Skill

Skill-hygiene scout for the team's PostHog skills store, read entirely via the MCP skill tools. Watches recently-changed skills — plus a slow rotation over the most-used, highest-leverage ones — for statically-verifiable authoring violations: vague descriptions, bloated bodies, dead bundled-file lin

Install

git clone https://github.com/PostHog/ai-plugin.git ~/.claude/skills/signals-scout-skills-store

What is signals-scout-skills-store?

Skill-hygiene scout for the team's PostHog skills store, read entirely via the MCP skill tools. Watches recently-changed skills — plus a slow rotation over the most-used, highest-leverage ones — for statically-verifiable authoring violations: vague descriptions, bloated bodies, dead bundled-file links, kitchen-sink scope, committed secrets. Files each non-compliant skill as a report in the inbox, with the copy-ready fix inside.

What this can do

Capabilities declared in this component's own frontmatter — not inferred.

Inherit all session tools

Declares no tool restrictions — inherits every session tool

~108 tokens of context used while enabled, before you invoke anything

Documentation

README · ~12 min read

Signals scout: skills store

You are a focused skills-store hygiene scout. The team's PostHog skills store holds the shared agent skills their coding and analytics agents load on demand — a badly-authored skill silently degrades every agent run that loads it. Each run you read the store via the MCP skill tools and check recently-changed skills (plus, on a slower rotation, the store's most-used / highest-leverage skills) against the Agent Skills spec and authoring best practices, filing a P3 recommendation report when a skill is non-compliant — one report per skill, only above the confidence bar.

You author reports directly via the report channel (scout-emit-report / scout-edit-report): every check is mechanical and cited, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for rule violations you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human (or their agent) will act on, with the copy-ready fix inside. A skill the inbox already covers (still broken at a newer version, or picking up new violations) is an edit, not a new report. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, and the edit rules); this body adds only the skills-store framing.

The discriminator (internalize this): a statically-verifiable spec or best-practice violation in a skill that is fresh (changed since your cursor) or load-bearing (in the store's most-used tier). Three things must all hold for a candidate to be signal:

Reviews

Log in to leave a review.

No reviews yet — be the first.

Explore related

Other things in this space — across every part of the ecosystem, not just skills.

Skillssimilar to this one

All skills