xrpl-referee vs SchemaSure — structured extraction

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricxrpl-refereeMCP Server SchemaSure — structured extractionMCP Server

Type: xrpl-refereeMCP Server; SchemaSure — structured extractionMCP Server
Category: xrpl-refereePayments; SchemaSure — structured extractionPayments
GitHub stars: xrpl-referee0; SchemaSure — structured extraction0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: xrpl-refereeNot yet assessed; SchemaSure — structured extractionNot yet assessed
Community rating: xrpl-refereeNo reviews yet; SchemaSure — structured extractionNo reviews yet
Last commit: xrpl-refereeUnknown; SchemaSure — structured extractionUnknown
Licence: xrpl-refereeNone declared; SchemaSure — structured extractionNone declared
Official: xrpl-refereeNo; SchemaSure — structured extractionNo
Source: xrpl-referee Repository; SchemaSure — structured extraction Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.