xrpl-identity-mcp vs Roster

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricxrpl-identity-mcpMCP Server RosterMCP Server

Type: xrpl-identity-mcpMCP Server; RosterMCP Server
Category: xrpl-identity-mcpAutomation; RosterAutomation
GitHub stars: xrpl-identity-mcp0; Roster0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: xrpl-identity-mcpNot yet assessed; RosterNot yet assessed
Community rating: xrpl-identity-mcpNo reviews yet; RosterNo reviews yet
Last commit: xrpl-identity-mcpUnknown; RosterUnknown
Licence: xrpl-identity-mcpNone declared; RosterNone declared
Official: xrpl-identity-mcpNo; RosterNo
Source: xrpl-identity-mcp Repository; RosterNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.