MCP Workboard vs uselessfacts

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMCP WorkboardMCP Server uselessfactsMCP Server

Type: MCP WorkboardMCP Server; uselessfactsMCP Server
Category: MCP WorkboardOther; uselessfactsOther
GitHub stars: MCP Workboard0; uselessfacts0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: MCP WorkboardNot yet assessed; uselessfacts74/100 · Good
Community rating: MCP WorkboardNo reviews yet; uselessfactsNo reviews yet
Last commit: MCP WorkboardUnknown; uselessfacts58 days ago
Licence: MCP WorkboardNone declared; uselessfactsMIT
Official: MCP WorkboardNo; uselessfactsNo
Source: MCP Workboard Repository; uselessfacts Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.