WHOOP — MissingMCP vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricWHOOP — MissingMCPMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: WHOOP — MissingMCPMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: WHOOP — MissingMCPSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: WHOOP — MissingMCP0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: WHOOP — MissingMCPNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: WHOOP — MissingMCPNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: WHOOP — MissingMCPUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: WHOOP — MissingMCPNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: WHOOP — MissingMCPNo; cobblesNo
Source: WHOOP — MissingMCP Repository; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.