UX-Auditor-Pro vs AI Security Gateway — MCP Gateway

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricUX-Auditor-ProMCP Server AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayMCP Server

Type: UX-Auditor-ProMCP Server; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayMCP Server
Category: UX-Auditor-ProSecurity; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewaySecurity
GitHub stars: UX-Auditor-Pro0; AI Security Gateway — MCP Gateway0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: UX-Auditor-ProNot yet assessed; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNot yet assessed
Community rating: UX-Auditor-ProNo reviews yet; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNo reviews yet
Last commit: UX-Auditor-ProUnknown; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayUnknown
Licence: UX-Auditor-ProNone declared; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNone declared
Official: UX-Auditor-ProNo; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNo
Source: UX-Auditor-ProNot available; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.