twscrape Twitter/X (read-only) vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metrictwscrape Twitter/X (read-only)MCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)MCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)Other; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)Not yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)No reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)Unknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)None declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only)No; iota-mcpNo
Source: twscrape Twitter/X (read-only) Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.