Microsoft Teams API vs llamanotes

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMicrosoft Teams APIMCP Server llamanotesMCP Server

Type: Microsoft Teams APIMCP Server; llamanotesMCP Server
Category: Microsoft Teams APICommunication; llamanotesCommunication
GitHub stars: Microsoft Teams API0; llamanotes0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Microsoft Teams APINot yet assessed; llamanotesNot yet assessed
Community rating: Microsoft Teams APINo reviews yet; llamanotesNo reviews yet
Last commit: Microsoft Teams APIUnknown; llamanotesUnknown
Licence: Microsoft Teams APINone declared; llamanotesNone declared
Official: Microsoft Teams APINo; llamanotesNo
Source: Microsoft Teams API Repository; llamanotesNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.