Taste vs SQD Portal

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricTasteMCP Server SQD PortalMCP Server

Type: TasteMCP Server; SQD PortalMCP Server
Category: TasteCrypto; SQD PortalCrypto
GitHub stars: Taste0; SQD Portal1
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Taste74/100 · Good; SQD Portal79/100 · Good
Community rating: TasteNo reviews yet; SQD PortalNo reviews yet
Last commit: Taste68 days ago; SQD Portal15 days ago
Licence: TasteMIT; SQD PortalMIT
Official: TasteNo; SQD PortalNo
Source: Taste Repository; SQD Portal Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.