stat-api — Sports Data vs Recite MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricstat-api — Sports DataMCP Server Recite MCPMCP Server

Type: stat-api — Sports DataMCP Server; Recite MCPMCP Server
Category: stat-api — Sports DataFinance; Recite MCPFinance
GitHub stars: stat-api — Sports Data0; Recite MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: stat-api — Sports DataNot yet assessed; Recite MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: stat-api — Sports DataNo reviews yet; Recite MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: stat-api — Sports DataUnknown; Recite MCPUnknown
Licence: stat-api — Sports DataNone declared; Recite MCPNone declared
Official: stat-api — Sports DataNo; Recite MCPNo
Source: stat-api — Sports Data Repository; Recite MCP Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.