SpineFrame vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricSpineFrameMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: SpineFrameMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: SpineFrameSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: SpineFrame0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: SpineFrameNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: SpineFrameNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: SpineFrameUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: SpineFrameNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: SpineFrameNo; cobblesNo
Source: SpineFrame Repository; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.