site-audit vs Agentic Terminal Directory

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricsite-auditMCP Server Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server

Type: site-auditMCP Server; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server
Category: site-auditPayments; Agentic Terminal DirectoryPayments
GitHub stars: site-audit0; Agentic Terminal Directory0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: site-auditNot yet assessed; Agentic Terminal Directory79/100 · Good
Community rating: site-auditNo reviews yet; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo reviews yet
Last commit: site-auditUnknown; Agentic Terminal Directory5 days ago
Licence: site-auditNone declared; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMIT
Official: site-auditNo; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo
Source: site-auditNot available; Agentic Terminal Directory Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.