shell-use vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricshell-useMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: shell-useMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: shell-useOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: shell-use0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: shell-useNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: shell-useNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: shell-useUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: shell-useNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: shell-useNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: shell-use Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.