Semantic Scholar MCP Server vs fci-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricSemantic Scholar MCP ServerMCP Server fci-mcpMCP Server

Type: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerMCP Server; fci-mcpMCP Server
Category: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerScience; fci-mcpScience
GitHub stars: Semantic Scholar MCP Server0; fci-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerNot yet assessed; fci-mcpNot yet assessed
Community rating: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerNo reviews yet; fci-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerUnknown; fci-mcpUnknown
Licence: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerNone declared; fci-mcpNone declared
Official: Semantic Scholar MCP ServerNo; fci-mcpNo
Source: Semantic Scholar MCP Server Repository; fci-mcpNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.