SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via Lightning vs SQD Portal

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricSatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningMCP Server SQD PortalMCP Server

Type: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningMCP Server; SQD PortalMCP Server
Category: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningCrypto; SQD PortalCrypto
GitHub stars: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via Lightning0; SQD Portal1
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningNot yet assessed; SQD Portal79/100 · Good
Community rating: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningNo reviews yet; SQD PortalNo reviews yet
Last commit: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningUnknown; SQD Portal15 days ago
Licence: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningNone declared; SQD PortalMIT
Official: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via LightningNo; SQD PortalNo
Source: SatoshiAPI — Bitcoin Data via Lightning Repository; SQD Portal Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.