run.pay vs Agentic Terminal Directory

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricrun.payMCP Server Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server

Type: run.payMCP Server; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server
Category: run.payPayments; Agentic Terminal DirectoryPayments
GitHub stars: run.pay0; Agentic Terminal Directory0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: run.payNot yet assessed; Agentic Terminal Directory79/100 · Good
Community rating: run.payNo reviews yet; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo reviews yet
Last commit: run.payUnknown; Agentic Terminal Directory5 days ago
Licence: run.payNone declared; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMIT
Official: run.payNo; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo
Source: run.pay Repository; Agentic Terminal Directory Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.