Raven — Solana Token Verification vs SQD Portal

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricRaven — Solana Token VerificationMCP Server SQD PortalMCP Server

Type: Raven — Solana Token VerificationMCP Server; SQD PortalMCP Server
Category: Raven — Solana Token VerificationCrypto; SQD PortalCrypto
GitHub stars: Raven — Solana Token Verification0; SQD Portal1
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Raven — Solana Token VerificationNot yet assessed; SQD Portal79/100 · Good
Community rating: Raven — Solana Token VerificationNo reviews yet; SQD PortalNo reviews yet
Last commit: Raven — Solana Token VerificationUnknown; SQD Portal16 days ago
Licence: Raven — Solana Token VerificationNone declared; SQD PortalMIT
Official: Raven — Solana Token VerificationNo; SQD PortalNo
Source: Raven — Solana Token Verification Repository; SQD Portal Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.