Quality Screener vs Recite MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricQuality ScreenerMCP Server Recite MCPMCP Server

Type: Quality ScreenerMCP Server; Recite MCPMCP Server
Category: Quality ScreenerFinance; Recite MCPFinance
GitHub stars: Quality Screener0; Recite MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Quality ScreenerNot yet assessed; Recite MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: Quality ScreenerNo reviews yet; Recite MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: Quality ScreenerUnknown; Recite MCPUnknown
Licence: Quality ScreenerNone declared; Recite MCPNone declared
Official: Quality ScreenerNo; Recite MCPNo
Source: Quality Screener Repository; Recite MCP Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.