Root Data Public Directory vs L2beat

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricRoot Data Public DirectoryMCP Server L2beatMCP Server

Type: Root Data Public DirectoryMCP Server; L2beatMCP Server
Category: Root Data Public DirectoryAnalytics; L2beatAnalytics
GitHub stars: Root Data Public Directory0; L2beat0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Root Data Public DirectoryNot yet assessed; L2beat74/100 · Good
Community rating: Root Data Public DirectoryNo reviews yet; L2beatNo reviews yet
Last commit: Root Data Public DirectoryUnknown; L2beat58 days ago
Licence: Root Data Public DirectoryNone declared; L2beatMIT
Official: Root Data Public DirectoryNo; L2beatNo
Source: Root Data Public DirectoryNot available; L2beat Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.