Prism — Crossdeck vs Recite MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricPrism — CrossdeckMCP Server Recite MCPMCP Server

Type: Prism — CrossdeckMCP Server; Recite MCPMCP Server
Category: Prism — CrossdeckFinance; Recite MCPFinance
GitHub stars: Prism — Crossdeck0; Recite MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Prism — CrossdeckNot yet assessed; Recite MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: Prism — CrossdeckNo reviews yet; Recite MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: Prism — CrossdeckUnknown; Recite MCPUnknown
Licence: Prism — CrossdeckNone declared; Recite MCPNone declared
Official: Prism — CrossdeckNo; Recite MCPNo
Source: Prism — Crossdeck Repository; Recite MCP Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.