PortlandMaps (Unofficial) vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricPortlandMaps (Unofficial)MCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)MCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)Other; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)Not yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)No reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)Unknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)None declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: PortlandMaps (Unofficial)No; iota-mcpNo
Source: PortlandMaps (Unofficial) Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.