SQD Portal vs aTars MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricSQD PortalMCP Server aTars MCPMCP Server

Type: SQD PortalMCP Server; aTars MCPMCP Server
Category: SQD PortalCrypto; aTars MCPCrypto
GitHub stars: SQD Portal1; aTars MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: SQD Portal79/100 · Good; aTars MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: SQD PortalNo reviews yet; aTars MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: SQD Portal15 days ago; aTars MCPUnknown
Licence: SQD PortalMIT; aTars MCPNone declared
Official: SQD PortalNo; aTars MCPNo
Source: SQD Portal Repository; aTars MCPNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.