Planomy Planner vs Recite MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricPlanomy PlannerMCP Server Recite MCPMCP Server

Type: Planomy PlannerMCP Server; Recite MCPMCP Server
Category: Planomy PlannerFinance; Recite MCPFinance
GitHub stars: Planomy Planner0; Recite MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Planomy PlannerNot yet assessed; Recite MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: Planomy PlannerNo reviews yet; Recite MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: Planomy PlannerUnknown; Recite MCPUnknown
Licence: Planomy PlannerNone declared; Recite MCPNone declared
Official: Planomy PlannerNo; Recite MCPNo
Source: Planomy Planner Repository; Recite MCP Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.