PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receipts vs uselessfacts

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricPEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsMCP Server uselessfactsMCP Server

Type: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsMCP Server; uselessfactsMCP Server
Category: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsOther; uselessfactsOther
GitHub stars: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receipts0; uselessfacts0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsNot yet assessed; uselessfacts74/100 · Good
Community rating: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsNo reviews yet; uselessfactsNo reviews yet
Last commit: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsUnknown; uselessfacts58 days ago
Licence: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsNone declared; uselessfactsMIT
Official: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receiptsNo; uselessfactsNo
Source: PEAC Protocol: Signed interaction receipts Repository; uselessfacts Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.