Source Parts vs Roster

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricSource PartsMCP Server RosterMCP Server

Type: Source PartsMCP Server; RosterMCP Server
Category: Source PartsAutomation; RosterAutomation
GitHub stars: Source Parts0; Roster0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Source PartsNot yet assessed; RosterNot yet assessed
Community rating: Source PartsNo reviews yet; RosterNo reviews yet
Last commit: Source PartsUnknown; RosterUnknown
Licence: Source PartsNone declared; RosterNone declared
Official: Source PartsNo; RosterNo
Source: Source Parts Repository; RosterNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.