ownership-provenance-protocol vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricownership-provenance-protocolMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: ownership-provenance-protocolMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: ownership-provenance-protocolOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: ownership-provenance-protocol0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: ownership-provenance-protocolNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: ownership-provenance-protocolNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: ownership-provenance-protocolUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: ownership-provenance-protocolNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: ownership-provenance-protocolNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: ownership-provenance-protocol Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.