OpenWarrant — Reference Verification vs Launch Library

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricOpenWarrant — Reference VerificationMCP Server Launch LibraryMCP Server

Type: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationMCP Server; Launch LibraryMCP Server
Category: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationScience; Launch LibraryScience
GitHub stars: OpenWarrant — Reference Verification0; Launch Library0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationNot yet assessed; Launch Library74/100 · Good
Community rating: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationNo reviews yet; Launch LibraryNo reviews yet
Last commit: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationUnknown; Launch Library58 days ago
Licence: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationNone declared; Launch LibraryMIT
Official: OpenWarrant — Reference VerificationNo; Launch LibraryNo
Source: OpenWarrant — Reference Verification Repository; Launch Library Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.