openbrowser-ai vs kogiQA MCP Web Browser

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricopenbrowser-aiMCP Server kogiQA MCP Web BrowserMCP Server

Type: openbrowser-aiMCP Server; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserMCP Server
Category: openbrowser-aiBrowser; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserBrowser
GitHub stars: openbrowser-ai0; kogiQA MCP Web Browser0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: openbrowser-aiNot yet assessed; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserNot yet assessed
Community rating: openbrowser-aiNo reviews yet; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserNo reviews yet
Last commit: openbrowser-aiUnknown; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserUnknown
Licence: openbrowser-aiNone declared; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserNone declared
Official: openbrowser-aiNo; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserNo
Source: openbrowser-ai Repository; kogiQA MCP Web BrowserNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.