open-mcp-registry vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricopen-mcp-registryMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: open-mcp-registryMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: open-mcp-registryOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: open-mcp-registry0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: open-mcp-registryNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: open-mcp-registryNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: open-mcp-registryUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: open-mcp-registryNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: open-mcp-registryNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: open-mcp-registry Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.