NeuroDock Guardrail vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricNeuroDock GuardrailMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: NeuroDock GuardrailMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: NeuroDock GuardrailSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: NeuroDock Guardrail0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: NeuroDock GuardrailNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: NeuroDock GuardrailNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: NeuroDock GuardrailUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: NeuroDock GuardrailNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: NeuroDock GuardrailNo; cobblesNo
Source: NeuroDock Guardrail Repository; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.