MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted vs enforcement-database

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedMCP Server enforcement-databaseMCP Server

Type: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedMCP Server; enforcement-databaseMCP Server
Category: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedDatabases; enforcement-databaseDatabases
GitHub stars: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted7; enforcement-database0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted57/100 · Fair; enforcement-databaseNot yet assessed
Community rating: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedNo reviews yet; enforcement-databaseNo reviews yet
Last commit: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted315 days ago; enforcement-databaseUnknown
Licence: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedNone declared; enforcement-databaseNone declared
Official: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedNo; enforcement-databaseNo
Source: MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted Repository; enforcement-database Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.