MCP ZAP Server vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMCP ZAP ServerMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: MCP ZAP ServerMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: MCP ZAP ServerSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: MCP ZAP Server0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: MCP ZAP ServerNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: MCP ZAP ServerNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: MCP ZAP ServerUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: MCP ZAP ServerNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: MCP ZAP ServerNo; cobblesNo
Source: MCP ZAP Server Repository; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.