mcp-stone vs Agentic Terminal Directory

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-stoneMCP Server Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server

Type: mcp-stoneMCP Server; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server
Category: mcp-stonePayments; Agentic Terminal DirectoryPayments
GitHub stars: mcp-stone0; Agentic Terminal Directory0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-stoneNot yet assessed; Agentic Terminal Directory79/100 · Good
Community rating: mcp-stoneNo reviews yet; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-stoneUnknown; Agentic Terminal Directory5 days ago
Licence: mcp-stoneNone declared; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMIT
Official: mcp-stoneNo; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo
Source: mcp-stone Repository; Agentic Terminal Directory Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.