mcp-signer vs SQD Portal

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-signerMCP Server SQD PortalMCP Server

Type: mcp-signerMCP Server; SQD PortalMCP Server
Category: mcp-signerCrypto; SQD PortalCrypto
GitHub stars: mcp-signer0; SQD Portal1
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-signerNot yet assessed; SQD Portal79/100 · Good
Community rating: mcp-signerNo reviews yet; SQD PortalNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-signerUnknown; SQD Portal15 days ago
Licence: mcp-signerNone declared; SQD PortalMIT
Official: mcp-signerNo; SQD PortalNo
Source: mcp-signer Repository; SQD Portal Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.