mcp-pdf vs adeu

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-pdfMCP Server adeuMCP Server

Type: mcp-pdfMCP Server; adeuMCP Server
Category: mcp-pdfDocuments; adeuDocuments
GitHub stars: mcp-pdf0; adeu131
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-pdfNot yet assessed; adeu87/100 · Excellent
Community rating: mcp-pdfNo reviews yet; adeuNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-pdfUnknown; adeu3 days ago
Licence: mcp-pdfNone declared; adeuMIT
Official: mcp-pdfNo; adeuNo
Source: mcp-pdf Repository; adeu Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.