mcp-neo4j-data-modeling vs Statey

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-neo4j-data-modelingMCP Server StateyMCP Server

Type: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingMCP Server; StateyMCP Server
Category: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingDatabases; StateyDatabases
GitHub stars: mcp-neo4j-data-modeling0; Statey0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingNot yet assessed; StateyNot yet assessed
Community rating: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingNo reviews yet; StateyNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingUnknown; StateyUnknown
Licence: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingNone declared; StateyNone declared
Official: mcp-neo4j-data-modelingNo; StateyNo
Source: mcp-neo4j-data-modeling Repository; StateyNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.