mcp-neo4j-aura-manager vs Statey

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-neo4j-aura-managerMCP Server StateyMCP Server

Type: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerMCP Server; StateyMCP Server
Category: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerDatabases; StateyDatabases
GitHub stars: mcp-neo4j-aura-manager0; Statey0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerNot yet assessed; StateyNot yet assessed
Community rating: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerNo reviews yet; StateyNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerUnknown; StateyUnknown
Licence: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerNone declared; StateyNone declared
Official: mcp-neo4j-aura-managerNo; StateyNo
Source: mcp-neo4j-aura-manager Repository; StateyNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.