n8n MCP Server vs Roster

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricn8n MCP ServerMCP Server RosterMCP Server

Type: n8n MCP ServerMCP Server; RosterMCP Server
Category: n8n MCP ServerAutomation; RosterAutomation
GitHub stars: n8n MCP Server0; Roster0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: n8n MCP ServerNot yet assessed; RosterNot yet assessed
Community rating: n8n MCP ServerNo reviews yet; RosterNo reviews yet
Last commit: n8n MCP ServerUnknown; RosterUnknown
Licence: n8n MCP ServerNone declared; RosterNone declared
Official: n8n MCP ServerNo; RosterNo
Source: n8n MCP Server Repository; RosterNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.