mcp-hd-wallet vs SQD Portal

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-hd-walletMCP Server SQD PortalMCP Server

Type: mcp-hd-walletMCP Server; SQD PortalMCP Server
Category: mcp-hd-walletCrypto; SQD PortalCrypto
GitHub stars: mcp-hd-wallet0; SQD Portal1
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-hd-walletNot yet assessed; SQD Portal79/100 · Good
Community rating: mcp-hd-walletNo reviews yet; SQD PortalNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-hd-walletUnknown; SQD Portal15 days ago
Licence: mcp-hd-walletNone declared; SQD PortalMIT
Official: mcp-hd-walletNo; SQD PortalNo
Source: mcp-hd-wallet Repository; SQD Portal Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.