MCP Gateway Scan vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMCP Gateway ScanMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: MCP Gateway ScanMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: MCP Gateway ScanSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: MCP Gateway Scan0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: MCP Gateway ScanNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: MCP Gateway ScanNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: MCP Gateway ScanUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: MCP Gateway ScanNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: MCP Gateway ScanNo; cobblesNo
Source: MCP Gateway Scan Repository; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.