MCP Fortress vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMCP FortressMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: MCP FortressMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: MCP FortressSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: MCP Fortress0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: MCP FortressNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: MCP FortressNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: MCP FortressUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: MCP FortressNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: MCP FortressNo; cobblesNo
Source: MCP FortressNot available; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.