mcp-eval-runner vs Roster

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-eval-runnerMCP Server RosterMCP Server

Type: mcp-eval-runnerMCP Server; RosterMCP Server
Category: mcp-eval-runnerAutomation; RosterAutomation
GitHub stars: mcp-eval-runner0; Roster0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-eval-runnerNot yet assessed; RosterNot yet assessed
Community rating: mcp-eval-runnerNo reviews yet; RosterNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-eval-runnerUnknown; RosterUnknown
Licence: mcp-eval-runnerNone declared; RosterNone declared
Official: mcp-eval-runnerNo; RosterNo
Source: mcp-eval-runner Repository; RosterNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.