mcp-dashboards vs L2beat

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-dashboardsMCP Server L2beatMCP Server

Type: mcp-dashboardsMCP Server; L2beatMCP Server
Category: mcp-dashboardsAnalytics; L2beatAnalytics
GitHub stars: mcp-dashboards0; L2beat0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-dashboardsNot yet assessed; L2beat74/100 · Good
Community rating: mcp-dashboardsNo reviews yet; L2beatNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-dashboardsUnknown; L2beat58 days ago
Licence: mcp-dashboardsNone declared; L2beatMIT
Official: mcp-dashboardsNo; L2beatNo
Source: mcp-dashboards Repository; L2beat Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.