Filtrous MCP Catalog Server vs uselessfacts

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricFiltrous MCP Catalog ServerMCP Server uselessfactsMCP Server

Type: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerMCP Server; uselessfactsMCP Server
Category: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerOther; uselessfactsOther
GitHub stars: Filtrous MCP Catalog Server0; uselessfacts0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerNot yet assessed; uselessfacts74/100 · Good
Community rating: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerNo reviews yet; uselessfactsNo reviews yet
Last commit: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerUnknown; uselessfacts58 days ago
Licence: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerNone declared; uselessfactsMIT
Official: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerNo; uselessfactsNo
Source: Filtrous MCP Catalog ServerNot available; uselessfacts Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.