MCP Blast-Radius Auditor vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricMCP Blast-Radius AuditorMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: MCP Blast-Radius Auditor0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: MCP Blast-Radius AuditorNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: MCP Blast-Radius Auditor Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.