mcp-atlas vs HAPI MCP Server

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricmcp-atlasMCP Server HAPI MCP ServerMCP Server

Type: mcp-atlasMCP Server; HAPI MCP ServerMCP Server
Category: mcp-atlasAPI Tools; HAPI MCP ServerAPI Tools
GitHub stars: mcp-atlas1; HAPI MCP Server0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: mcp-atlas79/100 · Good; HAPI MCP ServerNot yet assessed
Community rating: mcp-atlasNo reviews yet; HAPI MCP ServerNo reviews yet
Last commit: mcp-atlas28 days ago; HAPI MCP ServerUnknown
Licence: mcp-atlasMIT; HAPI MCP ServerNone declared
Official: mcp-atlasNo; HAPI MCP ServerNo
Source: mcp-atlas Repository; HAPI MCP Server Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.