Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth) vs zopaf

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricLinear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)MCP Server zopafMCP Server

Type: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)MCP Server; zopafMCP Server
Category: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)AI Tools; zopafAI Tools
GitHub stars: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)0; zopaf0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)Not yet assessed; zopafNot yet assessed
Community rating: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)No reviews yet; zopafNo reviews yet
Last commit: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)Unknown; zopafUnknown
Licence: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)None declared; zopafNone declared
Official: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth)No; zopafNo
Source: Linear MCP (multi-workspace, PAT auth) Repository; zopaf Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.