iwant.fyi - demand-side commerce vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metriciwant.fyi - demand-side commerceMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerce0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerceNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: iwant.fyi - demand-side commerce Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.