Intent-Verified Development (IVD) vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricIntent-Verified Development (IVD)MCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)MCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)Other; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)Not yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)No reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)Unknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)None declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: Intent-Verified Development (IVD)No; iota-mcpNo
Source: Intent-Verified Development (IVD) Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.