YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCP vs audit-ledger-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricYIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPMCP Server audit-ledger-mcpMCP Server

Type: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPMCP Server; audit-ledger-mcpMCP Server
Category: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPFinance; audit-ledger-mcpFinance
GitHub stars: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCP0; audit-ledger-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPNot yet assessed; audit-ledger-mcpNot yet assessed
Community rating: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPNo reviews yet; audit-ledger-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPUnknown; audit-ledger-mcpUnknown
Licence: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPNone declared; audit-ledger-mcpNone declared
Official: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCPNo; audit-ledger-mcpNo
Source: YIELD INTELLIGENCE — Passive Income MCP Repository; audit-ledger-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.